BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY
3 9999 06317 536 6
NATIONAL RECOVERY ADMINISTRATION
— ^ — _____
DIVISION OF REVIEW
EVIDENCE STUDY
NO. 5
OF
THE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
Prepared by
AL F. O'DONNELL
AUGUST, 1935
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
(NOT FOR RELEASE: FOR USE IN DIVISION ONLY)
THE EVIDENCE STUDY SERIES
The EVIDENCE STUDIES were originally planned as a means of gathering
evidence bearing upon various legal issues which arose under the National
Industrial Recovery Act.
These studies have value quite aside from the use for which they were
originally intended. Accordingly, they are now made available for confidential
use within the Division of Review, and for inclusion in Code Histories*
The full list of the Evidence Studies is as follows;
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Automobile Manufacturing Ind.
Boot and Shoe Mfg. Ind.
Bottled Soft Drink Ind.
Builders' Supplies Ind.
Chemical Mf;
Ind,
Cigar Mfg. Industry
Construction Industry
Cotton Garp.ent Industry
Dress Mfg. Ind.
Electrical Contracting Ind.
Electrical Mfg. Ind,
Fab, Metal prod. Mfg. , etc.
Fishery Industry
Furniture Mfg. Ind.
General Contractors Ind.
Graphic Arts Ind.
Gray Iron Foundry Ind.
Hosiery Ind.
Infant's & Children's Wear Ind.
Iron and Steel Ind,
Leather
Lumber & Timber Prod. Ind.
23.
24.
2o ,
op
27 .
28.
29.
30.
51.
32.
40.
41.
42.
43.
Mason Contractors Industry
Me n ' s CI o thi ng Indus t ry
Motion picture Industry
Motor Bus Mfg. Industry (Dropped)
Needlework Ind. of Puerto Rico
Painting & Paperhanging & Decorating
photo Engraving Industry
Plumbing Contracting Industry
Retail Fooo. (See No. 42)
Retail Lumber Industry
Retail Solid Fuel (Dropped)
Retail Trade Industry
Rubber Mfg. Ind.
Rubber Tire Mfg. Ind.
Silk Textile Ind.
Structural Clay Products Ind.
Throwing Industry
Trucking Industry
Waste Materials Ind.
Wholesale & Retail Food Ind. (See No,
Wholesale Fresh Fruit & Veg. 31)
In addition to the studies brought to completion, certain materials have
been assembled for other industries. These MATERIALS are included in the series
and are also made available for confidential use within the Division of Review
and for inclusion in Code Histories, as follows;
44. Wool Textile Industry
45. Automotive parts & Equip. Ind.
46. Baking Industry
47. Canning Industry
48. Coat, and Suit Ind.
a 9
50.
51.
52.
Household Goods & Storage, etc. (Drop-
JUL- ti & O l/U i ct4C , Cl/U.\,JJiUM-
Le Retailing Trade Ind, ped)
Retail Tire 4 Battery Trade Ind.
Motor Vehiclf
Retail Tire & Battery Traae j
oa. Ship & Boat Bldg. & Repairing Ind,
53. Wholesaling or Distributing Trade
L. C. Marshall
Director, Division of Review
O^-b^V. \ ^U
C01TTE1TTS
Page
Foreword 1
CHAPTER I - THE NATURE OP THE BIDUSTRY 2
Definition of the Industry 2
Total Slumber of Establishments 2
ITumber of Establishments by
Principal States 2
Humber of Members of the Industry 2
Value of Products 4
Consumption of Chemicals 4
Capital Investment 4
CHAPTER II - LABOR STATISTICS 7
Number of Employees 7
Seasonality of Employment ... 7
Number of Employees per Establishment -7
Annual Wages 8.
Per Cent Labor Cost is of Total
Value of Product 8
Hourly and Weekly Wages and Hours
per Week .10
Emplo;rees under 16 Years of Age '10
CHAPTER III - MATERIALS: RAW AND SEMI -PROCESSED 12
Cost of Raw Materials ' 12
Domestic Sources of Ran Materials ^12
CHAPTER IV - PRODUCTION AID DISTRIBUTION 14
Vertical Integration 14
Value of Products in Principal States 14
Interstate Movement of Selected
Products 14
Value of Exports '14
CHAPTER V - GENERAL INFORMATION 19
Trade Associations 19
List of Experts 19
APPEI-IDIX 21
-oOo-
8544
TABLES
Page
TABLE II -
TABLE III -
TABLE I - Number of Establishments, "by
Principal States 3
Value of Production, "by Kind of
Product 5
Estimated Distribution of Sulphuric
Acid, Soda Ash, and Caustic Soda,
Consumed in United States "by Various
Industries, 1934 6
Seasonality of Employment, 1934 ' 7
Establishments Classified According to
Number of Eactory Workers, April, 1934. . . ' 8
ilumber of Establishments, lumber of
Employees, and Wages Paid, by States .... 9
Total Value of Product, Total Labor
Cost, and Total Cost of Materials '10
Average Hourly and Weekly Yfages and
Average Hours Per Week 11
Value of Products Produced, by
Principal States 15
TABLE X - Value of Selected Chemicals Exported '> 16
MPS
Page
MAP I - Distribution of Principal Rau
Materials Required by the Chemical
Industry 13
MAP II - Fnere Heavy Chemicals are Made and
Consumed (Sulphuric Acid Consumption) ... 17
MAP III - Where Heavy Chemicals are Made and
Consumed (Alkali Consumption) 18
~o0o-
TA3LE IV -
TABLE V -
TAELE VI -
TABLE VII -
TABLE VIII -
TABLE IX -
8544
-li-
„1-
THE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
Foreword
The data presented in this report have been assembled almost
entirely from governmental sources. Much of the material has been
taken from the Census of Manufactures reports on two industries,
"Chemicals Hot Elsewhere Classified," and "Explosives," which, when
combined, represent a classification roughly comparable with the Code
definition as explained in Chapter I. Other government data used are
those gathered by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of
Foreign and Domestic Commerce. Supplementary data have been obtained
from the Oil, paint, and Drug Reporter. Chemical and Metallurgical
Engineering, from material released by the Chemical Alliance, Incorpo-
rated, which acted as the Code Authority for the Industry, and from
the Chemical Foundation, Incorporated, a corporation organized to take
over German patents during the war and whose present activity consists
largely of promoting the general interests of the Industry through the
distribution of literature.
Due to lack of pertinent information, some of the topics called
for in the first, second, third, fourth, and sixth sections of the
"Outline for Collection of Evidence" have not been discussed in this
report. Section V of the outline was considered inapplicable to this
Industry since the Code contained no trade practice provisions.
8544
- 2 -
Chapter I
THE NATURE OF THE INDUSTRY
Definition, of the Industry
The Code definition restricts the Chemical Manufacturing Industry to "the
production and sale "by the producer of heavy, industrial, and fine chemicals,
and their "by-products unless separate codes ... are submitted "
Many chemical -producing industries which, normally would otherwise have
operated under the Chemical Manufacturing Industry Code, choose to submit and
operate under separate codes.
The Census of Manufactures does not include a classification which is
strictly comparable with the Industry as defined in the Chemical Manufacturing
Code. However, a combination of the data included under the Census Industries
No. 698, "Chemicals hot Elsewhere Classified" and ho. 613, "Explosives" was
considered sufficiently representative of the codified Industry to "be used in
this survey. The principal differences "between the scope of these two class-
ifications combined and the Industry, as defined in the Code, are that the former
does not include ethyl alcohol, which accounts for about 5 per cent of the value
of output of the codified Industry , nor "by-product coke produced under the
Chemical Manufacturing Code. The combined Census classifications, furthermore,
include some items produced under Codes for the Lye Industry, Plastic Fabricator,
and. Hatural Organic Products. It is "believed that the combined Census class-
ifications and the Code classification have a"bout 90 per cent of their respective
coverages in common.
Total Ilumber of Establishments
As shown in Table 1, below, the number of establishments operating in the
Chemical Manufacturing Industry declined from 646 in 1929 to 607 in 1933.
Number of Establishments by Principal States
The number of establishments in each of the principal chemical -producing
states is shown in Table I. New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania contain the
largest number of establishments, in the order mentioned. Large numbers are also
located in Ohio, California and Illinois,
Number of Members of the Industry
A good idea of the number of members of the Chemical Industry may be obtain-
ed from the results of a survey undertaken in April, 1934, by The Chemical Alli-
ance, Incorporated, the leading trade association in the Industry. Question-
naires were sent to all members of the Alliance and returns were received from
337 chemical companies which covered the operations of 598 distinct factory units.
1/ This number compares vary well with the total of 607 plants shown in the 1933
Census. ____^___ _ _—
1/ The Chemical Alliance, Incorporated, "Report of the Committee on Statistics
Showing Distribution of Labor and Easic VJage Rates for the Chemical Manufacturing
Industry," (November 1934), p. 1.
3544
- 3 -
TABLE I
Number of Establishments, by Principal States
State
lumber of Establishments
1929
1931
.933
U. S. Total
645
636
607
Alabama
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Llaryland
Mas sachus et t s
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Hew Jersey
Hew York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Ehode Island
Tennessee
Tercas
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
3
7
7
5
2
1
51
54
54
5
5
4
7
7
9
45
41
39
10
11
10
5
5
6
4
3
3
6
4
4
9
10
10
16
21
19
15
19
13
4
4
3
14
12
12
103
106
97
101
92
85
53
60
55
5
3
3
70
71
71
7
6
4
10
10
11
11
11
16
11
10
12
11
12
7
19
18
14
7
6
6
Other States
23
26
27
Source: Census of Manufacturers. "Chemicals not Else-
where Classified" and "Explosives."
8544
Value of Products
The total value of chemicals produced in the Industry as defined in the
Code decreased fron $844,143,000 in 1329 to $615,036,000 in 1931, and to
$525,231,000 in 1933. The value of the more important chemical products is
shown in Table II. The decrease in value has "been general, but the groups
classified under "Miscellaneous Chemicals" and "Explosives" have apparently "been
the most seriously affected,
A similar summary of changes in the volume of production is not available.
Consumption of Chemicals
An indication of the consumption of chemicals "by other industries is given
in Table III. The information presented is confined to three principal products
— sulphuric acid, soda ash, and caustic soda. A ride variety of industries
purchase these products. The fertilizer and petroleum-refining industries were
the largest users of sulphuric acid in 1934. The largest quantity of soda ash
was used by the Chemical Industry itself; the second largest, by glass workers.
The Rayon Industry used a large share of caustic soda.
The location of six of the principal chemical-consuming industries is shown
in the Appendix Tables I to VI, inclusive. These tables ere presented merely
to indicate the wide geographic scatter of the consuming industries.
Capital Investment
Complete figures on the capital invested in the Chemical Industry are not
available. Francis P. Garvan, President of "he Chemical Foundation, Incorporated
estimated that in 1934 the 598 plants mentioned above had a capital investment
of over a billion dollars. "LI
1/ Garvan, Francis P., In the Hatter of a Pro-oosed Reci'orocal Trade between the
United States and Switzerland, published by The Chemical Foundation, Incorpo-
rated (1935), p. 41.
G544
- fi -
TABLE II
Value of Production, "by Kind of Product
(in thousands)
Kind of
Val
ue of Product
ion
Product
1929
1931a/
19315/
1933
Grand Total c/
$844-, 14-3
$615,096
$603,445
$525,231
Total "Chemicals Hot
Elsewhere Classified"
781,190
575,827
563,176
495,136
Acids
98,620
66,433
65,096
55,487
llitrogen & Fixed
ITitrogen
33,337
33,483
33, 262
30,756
Sodium Compounds
137,655
108,591
104,025
95,107
Potassium Compounds
9,998
8,112
8,112
7,434
Alums & Other Aluminum
Compounds
15,949
10,761
10,621
11,501
Coal Tar Products
130,652
103,083
100,532
107,273
Plasters
39,734
27 , 847
27,346
26,381
miscellaneous Chemicals
310,245
217,512
214,182
162,247
Total Explosives
62, 953
40,269
40,269
29 , 045
Dynamite
36,989
22,024
22, 024
J.D j td&O
Permissible Explosives
3,375
5,820
5,820
4,154
Nitroglycerin
2,447
434
434
451
Blasting Powder
7,750
4,909
4,909
4,056
Puse Ponder
427
293
293
186
Gunpowder Block & Other
Explosives
6,955
6 , 789
6,739
4,975
Source: Census of Manufactures,
"Chemicals,
Hot Elsewher
e Classified"
and
"Explosives. "
a/ Due to changes in Census schedule these figures are comparable
only with 1929.
b/ Due to change in Census schedule these fig-ores are comparable
only with 1933,
c/ The grand totals do not agree with totals shown in Tables VII and IX
since the above include chemicals made as secondary products in other
Industries, and exclude other products, not normally belonging to the
Chemical manufacturing Industry, which were made in chemical manufact-
uring plants.
3544
„ 6 -
TABLE III
Estimated Distribution of Sulphuric Acid, Soda Ash and Caustic
Soda, Consumed in United States by Various Industries, 1934
Thousands of Tons
Consuming
Industries
Sulphuric Acid
and
Soda
Caustic
(Basis 50° Baume)
Ash
Soda
Total
5,660
1,696
659
Fertilizer
Petroleum Refining
Chemicals
Coal Products
Iron and Steel
Other Metallurgical
Paint and Pigment
Rayon and Cellulose Fiber
Textile
Glass Works
Soap
Cleansers & Modified
Sodas
Pulp and Paper
Water Softening
Lye
Rubber Reclaiming
Vegetable Oil
Exports
Miscellaneous
1,450
1,100
755
535
475
390
210
230
75
580
80
109
250
—
140
28
33
480
—
175
93
100
_
70
37
40
—
—
34
—
9
—
9
45
65
170
50
Source: Oil, Paint and Drw; Reporter, May 27, 1935, Page 32;
(from "Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering Statistics"),
8544
-7-
Chapter II
LABOR STATISTICS
Number' "of Employees
The average number of employees in the Chemical Manufacturing Industry was
higher in 1934 than in 1929. Changes in employment since 1929 may be summarized
as follows; !_/
Average for 1929
Average for 1931
Average for 1933
Average for 1934
67,813 employees
53,255 employees
57,358 employees
71,500 employees
Seasonality of Employment
There appears to he little seasonal variation in employment in the Industry
considered as a whole. The monthly data for 1934, which are assembled in Table
IV, show that the number of employees at work in November, the low month, was
only 7 per cent below the peak in July. There was about the same variation in
total man-hours. However, if information were available for various branches of
the Industry, seasonal fluctuation for the individual branches would probably
appear more pronounced than it does in the totals where the seasonal variation
of one branch may be offset by that of another.
Number of Employees per Establishment
A few establishments employ a very large proportion of the total workers in
the Industry. As can be seen from Table V, the 10 per cent of the plants which
employed more than 250 employees in 1934 accounted for over 60 per cent of the
total employees. The remaining workers were scattered among a large number of
small plants.
TABLE IV
Seasonality of Employment, 1934
Week Ending
Nearest the
15th
Estimated Number
of Employees
Estimated Weekly
Man-Hours
(Thousands)
Estimated Weekly
Payroll
( Thousands )
Average
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
71 , 500
69 , 300
69 , 610
71,310
73,480
73,680
73,850
73,950
73,130
71 , 410
70,390
69,150
68,720
2,743
$1,580
2,692
1,481
2,705
1,506
2,743
1,526
2,857
1,645
2,730
1,618
2,825
1,642
2,858,
1,646
2,822
1,647
2,677
1,571
2,730
1,581
2,642
1,554
2,639
1,540
sties, Trend
of Employment,
Source: Basic data from the Bureau of Labor Stati
B.L.S. indexes for "Chemicals11 and "Explo
Census base figures for "Chemicals Not El
"Explosives" and adjusted by NEA to 1933
1/ See Tables IV and VI,
sives" have b
sewhere Class
Census totals
een multiplied by
ified" and
-8-
TABLE V
Establishments Classified According to
Number of Factory Workers, April, 1934
Number of Factory Workers
per Establishment
Number
Per Cent of Total
Classified
Establish-
Employees
Establish-
Employees
ments
ments
20a/
„
3.3
•^
82
246
13.7
0.4
151
1,752
25.3
2.9
133
4,363
22.2
7.3
79
5,544
13.2
9.2
72
11,410
12.0
19.0
31
10,493
5.2
17.5
23
15,660
3.8
26.1
7
10,645
1.2
17.7
598
60,113
100.0
100.0
-
9,832
—
w—
—
69,945
— ■
—
No employees
1-5 employees
6-20 employees
21-50 employees
51-100 employees
101-250 employees
251-500 employees
501-1,000 employees
1,000 or more employees
Total Classified
Not Classified
Total
Source: The Chemical Alliance, Incorporated, "Report of the Committee on Statis-
tics Showing Distribution of Labor and Basic Wage Rates for the Chemical
Manufacturing Industry." (November 1934), p. 2.
a/ Not operating
Note; There were 19,103 office workers in addition to the above, thus making
a total of 89,048 employees.
Annual Wages
The total wage bill of the Industry declined from $103,167,9»3 in 1929 to
$71,932,554 in 1931, and still further to $63,364,000 in 1933. Comparable Cen-
sus data are not available for 1934, but by multiplying the estimated average
weekly payroll of $1,580,000, shown in Table IV, by 52 weeks, we arrive at a
figure of $82,160,000 for the estimated annual payroll in 1934. From this it
would appear that earnings have not improved to the same extent as employment,
for it has previously been pointed out that 1934 employment was above the 1929
level.
Employment and annual wages in the principal chemical producing states are
shown in Table VI. New Jersey and New York have the largest number of employees
and the largest payrolls. Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois are also important
centers.
Per Cent Labor Cost is of Total Value of Product
Wages form a comparatively small proportion of the total value of chemical
products. The percentage has varied little since 1929, for, as can be seen from
Table VII, labor costs formed about 12 per cent of the total value in 1929, 1931
and 1933.
8544
~9~
?r)i1j
Cfl
b>
£j<| « hJ O fe! '-; S &: K S m n O
q
H
(B H> (D (D [? (D 0 H' H' J) p 3 H !J
p
H
CO 4 P P H- ^ :j co O to >-i pb i-i H
i-j
c+ C"J P P O CO p' CO "•< H- H- H-
<3
ISL
n
O
H- CD CO K| C'h O H- f) H9 0 H,
•
CD
c+
<(P Bl^ OCDpfftOPpOO
CO
• •
p"
H- H- CO M 4 i-i H p p' p p H» hi
hi P CD <J ri' CI H- P p p.. CO P
CO
ch
CD
•
P
|ro_lP^[oJc^
O 01
ch CD
|
1-3
pJ
o
CD
4
71 CD p CD CO H1
H- P "^ CD P
h3
c+
CD
P^d
CD
(3
C/l
P H- ch
o
CD p
a"
2
c+
p p cl-
c+
HD O O K3
4 4
CD
p
P
CO
M
Ej tS t* tS-
p
4
o
CO
c*-
O CD CD 4
cn ct-
c+
CD
CD
ct- CD
p M
o
Hj
CD
CO
o
Hj
to
[H^ IP^_ ^[h'J ICD^lP^ lO_
M M M
cl"^
p p o to'
CD •
CD
oJ
^ '
p & p m
02
r i
CD
P
P
c+ c+ ch p
•
>d
H
3
to • • p
= H3
j i
o
p
ct-
pJ
o
^
1— *3
cy
tn
CD
CO
IB
13
M
M
CD
P-
rl
O
H
H
cn
CD
M
to
g
Hj
E
<!
P"
ct"
LnI
H M -J VJ1 ^O O ^ y-1 h-1 -P" -P"
P
01
<rh O
1
o
O
P1
O
f HWON'^U -p"*->J V.J1 VD >vD Ul C 1
CT\
ch
If
P Hj
a1
o
'd
3
4
CD
b£
01
:
r
CD
hb
CD
H
4
CO
H
4
B
CD
P
0
tel
g >
CO
<rf-
O
ct-
Pj
s
H ^-,
cn
[3
B CD
C^ hj
CD P
p
Ni
co
P-
P
O
oa
M TO H -p" -p-Vj~l ^..J HUlfOHH.^ro
—j
d
i i
o
M
P-
[H-jV^l^
hd
H-
|3J
CD
on
vo p'v_si -:-^r\ o ^oi rj ^r-vo iyMOH
CQ
i
o
H
P
^j
o
Cn -P" CTl O O C O H H *-^J Vx' -^J M V^J
M
^
hi (TO
M
to
P
O
H-
^3
tamOH cn-~j 4---J -p" en en -p* o ro
OnI
CD
CD
vD
CD
br] K3 h3 hj'
P
ch
O
P
O
P
^
CD
01
ro
H- Cj Si H-
to
<)
p
H-1
P
<J O O <j
»•
CD
CD
to
ch
cd cd
p
O
-Gft-
E)
CO
>d 'd
CD
ct-
P
M
£
••
>d HM^
fn'
01
P-
O
M
ro ro
O
H p M H
p p p P
p c+ e+ p
H
o
<rt-
P
oh
O
p
c+
r\j
ro Vj^ h cn^i o o t->^o -pr\-' h cn^J
OJ
CD
'|
w
rvi
li)OU5rOK^-NlH OUiWTO -P
M
03
H1
c+ to en c-t-
CD
£j
M
H
-P'vn O ro -P"— J -p" en m H h-1 o m ^j-i
cn
CF1
w to
P- H-
H- P P P-
CD
CD
CO
to
CO
CD
VjJ
-^1 M h-"OT -P" O CTiV-O P' CT> ro M >^J W
-J
P
CD
4
Hj
CQ
VJ1 O -P"V.O ^J H M VJD PJ ^1 ^O <^I VJ3 -P"
V.O
3 P
*»
o
P
VJ1
ci ^>j oa v.o oa -p-c^i -^1 m ro CT\—j ^j u)
o
^
O
M H
hi
c+
CD
O
V.O ro ^w en o -p" o voi -~j c» u^ cnui
OJ
hQ
HU3VD H
P
y
4
^
vx> ro ro od
p
"_J
CD
CD
^
M
t?-J
fezj
t?J
ro oo vo ro
p<
b1
1 — '
H
o^
CD
H-
CO
£i
n
VD «.« KT)
H-
Hj
o
H
MM —J cn^3 O H H TO M P1 -P"^T
OJ
P
CO
a- o
'd
P
a
O
O
1 — 1
—J
-P'OVDMOOMro—JOOOM-p'
cn
ch
&
p t h
&
M
M p p
P
b
H
O
to
01
I
?"
CD
hi
o
0-1
P- pj
rj
Hj
i->
to
CD
P- P M
&
H-
o
H-
CD
P VD H
ch
r,-i
<rt-
Kj
t-J
%%
CO
h-1 OJ U3
p'
CD
H-
O1
j-t
w
HWHU
O
4
CD
CT\
ro i--1 m v.ni vai ^o v.o m -p* ro ^>J ro
O-J
"d
O
3 ro
vj3 OJ » • M
Hj
CD
HJ
M
Hj
cy 4
P
OJ M
M
CD
— ^i
O en o envn v.si p' o M -^i — a ~j cjoj
ro
o
CD p
i->
M M
-."*■
Hj
—
VJ1
cn^.o en m o ci en m v.o m oi cnvji o^
VJl
'-<
hi (ft.
M
p"
-• p -P"
& P-
P
O
CD
H
o ^ai ro en -p" envo p' ro m ro o ^j ro
Ol
CD
CD
>JD
Ota
0
hi
P
CD
oJ
^
ro pj p p-
P
CD
CO
CD
CD
pj
01
M
0^
H. i_j i_i
£j
O
CD
P VD VJD M
P
►d
CD
—
-eu-
^
to
OJ *-.aI UD
HJ
M
CO
w
M M
— j
S3
M OJ OJ OJ
K.O • • OJ ■
OJ •
CD
O
9
ca
ro ro m -p" -P" ro ^-jJ m cn^-j hhuiw
M
"ft
CD
01
P
H"
ch
CD
o
M
o
03 v.^i t— J — ~J — J co. on M v^i .p- o o O o>
V.O
OJ
P'
CD
O
'vjvl
cn--j — j m —j -p" o p~<on o von ro -P" m
>^j
Qj
•
CD
CD
to
ef-
CD
to
H-
<1
^n
ui -P" ro en-j ^j p'vjt —j en o v.o m o
ro
P
**
B
en
WJ H l\) Ol PJ CT^v.Q VO -4 -p" ro ^0 -~J -J
on
td
H,
CD
—j
C'l O Cn -p-V.O OWU O M f PHU3
-j ^o p'-^i ro vd v_si cn^j -p- m j_i ^ j_i
on
H-
<<
O
p<
DJ
01
ro
-P"
P-
4
O
•
Ul
CD
"A
p.
n
oh
p
"^
^3
M
fed
fe!
P
H-
"3
H
cn
CD
H-
to
P
ch
P
CD
o
h-1
MMM-JVJlCaU3MMMM OJVJ1
o
hj
01
c+ O
3
CD
O
CO
Hj
rv>
ro ro o m on -p"*^ ro en ci o vd v.o p"
—j
cl-
VJ
P Hj
cy
CO
P
CD
13"
01
I
t
CD
hi
ISL
CD
4
CD
P-
CD
ct-
m
on
f ^
H-
P
P>
en
WHMWjr-MHHPro ^J-lfO
-J
o
o
3 CD
p
o
cy
*•
JVJWNi.X«UV»>J.%»«J Vff u
*»
M
Hj
C31 i-s
c+
h-1
^,sl
m oq o vji v./j vxi v.o m --1 v>j ot v.o -~a en
OJ
O
CD p
—
CD
^J
FiH o OWro row h cn^J o cnWJ
on
^
s
hi cr^
M
is
CP3
-p"
a^i o — j ro ^.o Vj-j oj — j ro —j o cn—-! on
CQ
CD
o
X)
P-
h"
CD
_M
M
<!
CD
P
3
Oi
H-
O
P
c+
CD
CT\
M M
roroMONip-ov.>)Monro ojoj
cn
OkI
01
■=1
P
P3
CD
jj
ro
^r" O cn,cn-^j v,o Ovi ro ai ro vx> ca — j OnI
03 —j cno4 .p.-cncaro'wJ oroonro-^i
OJ
>OT
cn
01
CD
<XJ
-P" CQ p'V.O CO V.O -~J O O-J cn CQ M 4^ M
-p-
t-rl
oooro~-JOoroooooM--j
O
U1
OOOOJOJOOOJOOOO no
o
"5
OQ
O O O -P"U1 O OVjD
-10-
TABLE VII
Tctal Value of product, Total Labor Cost, and
Total Cost of Materials
Total Total labor Cost Total Materials Cost
Year Value of
product a/ Amount per Cent Amount Per Cent
(Thousands) (Thousands) of Total (Thousands) of Total
1929 $810,588 $103,163 12.7
1931 579,434 71,933 12.4
1933 511,609 63,364 12.4
$395,341
48.8
265,587
45.8
234,158
45.8
Source: Census of Manufactures, "Chemicals not Elsewhere Classified,"
and "Explosives."
a/ The totals shown here do not agree with those shown in Table II,
since the above do not include chemicals made as secondary products
in other industries, and include other products, not normally be-
longing to the Industry but made in chemical manufacturing plants.
Hourly and Weekly Wages and Hours per Week
Hourly wage rates in this Industry are high in comparison with most other
industries. The average in 1929 was 65.5 cents; in 1933 it was down to 56.2
cents, but it rose to 61.6 cents in 1934.
Average hours worked per week have decreased since 1931. In 1929 and 1931
the average working week was about 45 hours; in 1933, 40.7 hours; and in 1934,
38.4 hours.
Weekly earnings are affected both by wage rates and the length of the
working week. Thus, in the Chemical Industry the increase in hourly earnings
in 1934 has been counteracted by the reduction in hours, so that weekly earn-
ings in 1934 averaged only $23.67 as compared with $23.13 in 1933. In 1929 the
average was almost $30. The information pertaining to hoiirs and earnings is
summarized in Table VIII.
Employees under 16 Years of Age
Very few children have been employed in the Chemical Industry. The Census
of Occupations showed that only 773 "operatives" and 465 "laborers" from 10 to
15 years old were employed in "Chemical and Allied Industries" in 1930. This
classification is much broader than the one used in this report, since it in-
cluded, among others, rayon, fertilizer, charcoal, coke, gas, and petroleum
refinery workers who would be excluded from the Chemical Industry as defined
by the Code,
8544
-11-
TABLE VIII
Average Hourly and Weekly Wages and Average Hours Per Week a/
Average
Average
Average
Year
Hourly
Weekly
Weekly
Wages
Earnings
Hours
1929
$0,655
$29.67
45.3
1931
.607
27.54
45.4
1933
.562
23,13
40.7
1934
.616
23.67
38.4
Source; Data for 1929 and 1931 are national Industrial Conference
Board figures, adjusted toy tne Division of Research and
planning, ERA, to correspond with Bureau of LaDor Sta-
tistics figures which have "been available since 1932.
a/ Weekly averages "based upon data for the week ending
nearest the 15th of each <»onth.
8544
-13-
Chapter III
MATERIALS: RAW AHD SEMI-PROCESSED
Cost of Raw Materials
The Chemical Industry spent $395,341,000 for raw materials, fuel, and
electric power in 1929, $265,587,000 in 1931, and $234,153,000 in 1933. As
shown in Table VII above, the cost of raw materials is a very important fac-
tor in the total value of products. In 1929 raw materials formed almost 49
per cent of the total value, and in 1931 and 1933, about 46 per cent.
Domestic 'Sources of Raw Materials
The states in which the principal raw materials used by the Chemical In-
dustry are produced are shown graphically in Map I. There are no figures
available on the total quantities or value of each of these materials consumed
by the Chemical Industry, nor on the proportions of the total production of
these raw materials which are converted into chemicals.
The map cannot show precisely the sources of materials but an indication
of the interstate movement of raw" materials can be obtained from it. For
instance, New Jersey, which has been shown to be one of the two leading states
in the Chemical Manufacturing Industry, is not shown on this map as supplying
any raw materials for the Industry. This statement is, of course, a, broad
generalization and should not be taken too literally.
8544
MAP I
1
o «
aJ (X. -P
» _.
O
WW'-'
•H <{ p
a s © •
wow
Ol rl O)
a> © to
rH l-S
j3 »S"go)
O • -P P
m P m 0.
« © »
CM £ O
W 3 ©
,2 n n -
o> -p s*
P >» © «
r-t rH p
*-p -p *2
**
P -P
g p «J <a 3
0 0 © -p a
©
» 0 Q
M -H a)
U -H t, W r-«
d
O h<H
i«P H ti
.8*1
Si Ti ©
CO
0 rrt Ti (D N
©
7* 3
3 «« a
© P © -P -P
O
M P » -H •*
Sh
© •
d 5 O P fc
En (t, P43 JO
2
>* *4
O
M O
03
«tOa
••
U & P
©
O
P
asa
•rl © ©
13 w 0
O
u
M
O.
-14-
Chapter IV
PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION
Vertical Integration
The trend of corporate development in the Chemical Industry has been
toward consolidation and integration. The large organizations often control
all stages of processing from basic raw materials to consumer's goods. This
has "been due to the marked economies resulting from large scale production, con-
tinuous operation, and recent developments of processes for the efficient use
of "by-products.
The integration of the Industry eliminates the distribution problem of
some of the plants, as their outputs are taken up "by affiliated companies. As
a result of the intra-industry consumption of chemicals most products of the
Chemical Industry are in general sold and shipped in "bulk so that only about
40 per cent of the selling price of chemical products represents distribution
costs, l/ Only a relatively small percentage of the output of the Chemical
Manufacturing Industry is purchased "by the ultimate consumer in its original
form.
Value of Products in Principal States
The value of chemicals and explosives produced in .the various states is
shown in Table IX. For some states the value of explosives was not available,
so that the value of those states is somewhat understated, and to the same ex-
tent the value shown in "/J.1 Other States" is overstated. New York and New
Jersey are the leading producing states; these two states in 1933 produced about
38 per cent 2/ of the total value. Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois
also produce large amounts of chemicals.
There are no figures to indicate the total volume of chemicals produced
in each state.
Interstate Movement of Selected Products
The interstate movement of chemical products is illustrated by Maps II and
III which show the states in which sulphuric acids and alkalis are produced and
consumed.
Value of Exports
The value of important exports of chemicals produced in the Industry as
defined by the Code declined from $56,092,000 in 1929 to $32,185,000 in 1933.
In 1934 there was noticeable improvement and the value of exports rose to
$40,310,000. A summary of chemical exports is contained in Table X. The groups
shown in this table have been selected because they appeared to correspond most
closely with the Code definitions of the Chemical Manufacturing Industry.
1/ Haynes, Uilliam. Chemical Economies. Van Nostrand Co., New York (1933) p. 104
2/ This does not include the value of "explosives" produced in New York and
New Jersey.
8544
-15-
table ix
Value of Products Produced, "by Principal States a/
State
Value of Production in Each State (Thousands)
1929 " 1951 1933
U. S„ Total
$810,538
$579,434
California
24,636 b/
26,085
Illinois
64,513
47 , 681
Indiana
£./
13,798
7,051
Maryland
12 , 942
7,153
Massachusetts
a/
19,103
14,700
Michigan
?./
53,183
36,870
Missouri
19 , 425
13,150
New Jersey
a
155, 7S3
111,887
New York
d
168,629
110 , 325
Ohio
47,906
36,515
Pennsylvania
60,081
35,189
Tennessee
h/
18,320
17,443
Virginia
20,682
20,917
West Virginia
i/
22,859
21 , 741
All Other States
108,128
72,727
$511,609
26,319
33,117
7,111
7,345
12,697
37,707
12,772
97,162
96,496
37 , 949
33,389
13,609
18,833
19,484
57,619
Source:
sJ
a/
fi/
Census of Manufactures, "Chemicals not Elsewhere Classified," and
Explosives. "
The notes "below when read in connection with the footnote references
in the body of the table indicate the number of explosive plants in
given states for which figures on value of products were' not given
separately. The value of products for these plants is therefore in-
cluded in "All Other States."
Three plants.
One plant.
One plant.
Two plants.
Five plants in
1929 and 1931;
4 in 1933.
sj Two plants in 1929 and 1931;
1 in 1933.
h/ Two plants in 1929; 1 in 1931
and 1933,
i/ Pive plants in 1929; 4 in 1931;
2 in 1933.
8544
-16~
TABLE X
Value of Selected Chemicals Exported
Item
Value of Exports (Thousands)
1929
1931
1933
1934
Coal-Tar Products
Industrial Chemicals,
Exclusive of Com-
pressed and Liquefied
Gases
Nitrogenous Fertilizer
Materials
Explosives
Total
$18,061 $10,308 $12,421 $13,264
27 •, 091 18,947 15,973 20,730
7,526 4,828 2,729 4,940
3,414 1,177 1,062 1,376
56,092 35,260 32,185 40,310
Source: Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Comnerce, Monthly Summary of Foreign
Commerce of the United States (December issues).
8544
I
d
1
o
"S
I
o
M *J
M
n
a 8
•H
a
<D
e
&
©
o
u
o
III
.5
c
3
a!
o
•H
M
b
P
si
■1-i-r-
2!
o
a
i
X
©
-19-
Chapter V
GENERAL INFORMATION
Trade Associations
Important trade organizations in the Chemical Industry are: The Chemical
Alliance, Inc.; Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturers' Association; and
Manufacturing Chemists' Association of the United States. Membership lists
showed 510 members of the Chemical Alliance, Inc.; 42 members of Synthetic
Organic Chemical Manufacturers' Association, and 81 members of Manufacturing
Chemists* Association, at the end of 1934, 1/ The lists of members are over-
lapping as some companies appear on all three lists.
The Chemical Alliance, Inc., which has the largest membership, sponsored
the Code.
Experts
It is understood that the men listed below have not been consulted in
any way regarding their potential use as experts in connection with evidence
as to the interstate character of these industries and we have no information
available as to their education, experience and other qualifications. In most
instances leaders in the trade have designated these individuals as men best
qualified to discuss the particular segments of the industry for which we
are suggesting them as expert st
Solvents and Alkalies
Robert T. Baldwin, Chemists Club Building,
52 - East 41st Street, New York City
Secretary, American Chemists Society
Director, Chlorine Institute
Adviser on Industrial Alcohol Industry
Solvents
Glenn Haskell, U. S. Alcohol, Company, 42nd Street,
New York City
M. P. Chase, Commercial Solvents Corporation,
New York City
Alkalies
E. M. Allen, Mathieson Alkali Works, Hew York City
Irving Taylor, Michigan Alkali Co., 42nd St., New York City
A. B. Chadwick, Semet-Solvay Company, New York City
Chas. Millard, General Chemical Company, New York City
Harold Alouist, Consulting Engineer, 331 Madison Ave., New York City
Mr, St scuff » Semet-Solvay Company, New York City
1/ Garvan, Francis P., "A proposed Reciprocal Trade Treaty Between the
United States and Switzerland," published by "The Chemical Foundation,
Inc.," (1935) pp. 109 ff.
8544
~20~
Sulphuric Acid
Henry Merriam, General Chemical Company, Hew York City
Howard Mansfield, Graseili Company, Cleveland, Ohio.
Bynami t e
Mr. Higgins, Hercules powder Company, Sew York City
Heavy Chemicals
Chas. Belknap, Merrimac Chemical Company, Everett, Mass.
Pine Chemicals
George Merck, 161 - 6th Avenue, Hew York City
Potash
Horace Albright, Canadian Pacific Building, Hew York City
Foreign Trade
William Buffam, Chemical Foundation., Madison Ave., New York City
Francis C-arvan, Chemical Foundation, Madison Ave., New York City
Chlorine
Robert T. Baldwin, Chemists Club Building,
52 East 41st St., Hew York City
Carbon Bi oxide
George Pettee, Carbon Bioxide Institute,
Grand Central Bldg. , Hew York City
Nitrogen and nitrate of Soda
Chaplin Tyler, BuPont Company, Wilmington, Bel.
Coal Tar Products
Henry Atherton, President, Allied Chemicals Corp., Hew York City
Willard Bow, Bow Chemical Company, Midlands, Michigan
Orlando Weber, c/o Allied Chemicals Corp., Hew York City
General
Caeser Proto, Economist, BuPont Company, Wilmington, Bel.
Br. William J. Hale, Cosmos Club, Washington, B. C. ,
formerly consultant for the Bow Chemical Company
Hans Clarke, Medical Center, Hew York City, formerly
consultant for the Eastman Kodak Company
Sidney Kirkpatrick, Editor, Chemical and Metallurgical
Engineering, 42nd Street, Hew York City
8544
-21-
APFENDIX
Z$+h
X
n
a
CO
rH
fl3
o
•H
a
CD
.3
o
0
co
i=>
a
o
•H
i
!>»
01 H
CD +3
•H CO
?H 2
h-t
+3 Td
CO fl
Pi n
H
<S
K]
C! H
9
l-H 0
tSJ
EH
<H -H
O rH
•H
- +3
CO H
a) 0
-P pR
£8
-p 1
w
• •
iH H
a3 oj
Pi'H
•H H
O 0
a -P
•H Cfl
n a
Ph
£
>» o3
^ rt
- cd
fl
o
•H
-P
O
d
Ti
o
fn
Ph
<h
o
0
p)
rH
o3
>
8544
rH
cr>
H
rH
0
r^
a
CO
a
ni
co
P*
o
EH
I to
^> -P
ni C
m -P 0
© CO «
S oo
H <H -H
S OH
0
Pi
H
CO
rd
Pi
Cfl
CO
g
.ni
EH
I w
cS pi
h -p
0 co
& W ^
§ co
|3 Ch .H
S O rH
-33-
0
+3
-P
to
CTs
r— rH
oj rH
1 — M WJ-
CTi I-— rH rH
HOWJ
bO C\J
rH
CPiO CO LO
rH J-
-68-
0.1
J- r— r- i^\ cn c\j
t\J
CO l-O LT\ J- OJ t~-
LTv
OJ
CO
<xi
0
S
Pi
cd
O
OJ UD ji V^SQ o\
rH
co
LO
J- o j- r—
J- m
0J
>
pi
o
r-o
LT^60 OJ^t-
r — \r\
-=f
bO h- LOH-
rH UD
EH
ii^
HHHrl
rH I—
H
-ee-
1
•
co
fl
-p
fl3
£
u
+3
0
0
CO
s
oa
»X> LTMO O
\£\ LO
£
W
,3
0^
rH KA^O <=f
OJ rH
B
CO
m
rH
f^i
3
«H
•H
&5
O
H-'
m
C0
KM-— UD W Or>
LTA O LfA*X> >UD I —
OJ LT\ CTi^D r— f"\
rPvlXA OJ O LPi CO
OJ OJ OJ OJ rH rH
m c \ <y\ oj ^j- (js,
OJ KM-4 O] OJ
rH r^
CO
0
-p
03
oi
fl
+=
•H
m
rH
O
U
M
0
-d Hj
03 ^J
o3 S o
•rl fli -P
rH
•H oj
rt ■ri o
03
MH^I
•H tH
-P
r) >.-,+=
llDhH
O
O h !h
h O H
Eh
O CO o
■H rH <t.
> pr.
CO
0
N
-P
0
r(
-P
o
ai
CH
o3
o
CO
pi
co
0
o
0
o
In
Pi
O
03
nj
CD
i-H
Ctf
O
•H
S
CD
,3
O
CD
03
!=>
£i
o
•H
^H
t3 >S
Pi
03 -P
CD 03
■h d
Pi <3
-P Pi
03 l-H
-g M
s pi
HH -H
Pi
M
H
<+H -H
l-H
l-H
O <H
CD
^
m
-#
F3
HH
CO
Ph
Eh
Value of Production, Ly Frincipal State
a Ran Ilnterial: - Petroleum
in
<d
CD
fi
pi
Cu
rH
03
cd
pi
>
1
o
EH
•
ro
-p
n5
Pi
u
■p
(D
CD
03
,|
P
H
9
HH
'w
•rH
s
o
1 — !
cn
'd
0
Pi
pi
cti
rH
03
Co
Pi
>•
1
O
EH
0
03
^=>
■P
cj
P)
Pi
-p
CD
CD
03
£
&
M
^3
g
03
3
CH
•H
^
O
H
03
nd
CD
PI
pi
Cu
H
U3
cu
pi
>
o
EH
•
hh
I
03
o
,£3
Cj
-P
pi
-P
CD
CD
W
0
,P>
Ph
i — 1
l
«H
03
•tH
Y^
O
0
-P
03
-p
co
rH
rn
VO
r-
i-o
CO-
-03-
un
VO
'X)
Cn
r-<n
VD
n
cvj
03-
O
cn
o
EH
Cn LTV LCAVO i-H rH
cn cn co ir\ o to
CVI OJ-'lf'WU)
rH r^v r— vd cn cn
CVI rH H OJ J
O^
CO
w co ni — O f<n
,rf _=j- i-<n cnvo
rH
lca
CO
CVI
H co co j^- r— r—
VD KCnOM^H
rH cn cn co cn cn
OJ
un
r* ** •* ri *» *»
cn co ro cvi o cn
J-VD M h-H n
CVJ t-H H K^i LTV
VO
CO o
t —
IClri
r-o
i cvi cvi r^\
^t co^j-
VD H cvi cn LX^OJ
LCMTMO LT\ O H
r— h vjD cvi o co
«• c* p. B» a e.
^t I — r-n k> cn h
CO 0"\ CO ,-t H rH
^t CVI rH cm un cn
,=)- o co co i*n r—
Lin H Jt J- co j-
rH
03
CD
4=
03
4^
CO
■H
d
P|
o
«H
■H
rH
c3
o
Pi
aS
i>
H
>:>
03
Pi
PI
CD
O fi, EH
Pi
CD
4=
O
H
rH
"cjO
Pi
•iH
C.H
CD
CD
rH
O
Pi
CD
Ph
03
CD
O
a5
Vi
d
Pi
MH
o
03
Pi
03
PI
CD
O
CD
O
Pi
pi
o
CO
S5UH
-24-
§
Ph
Si
M
M
n
pq
t3
eh
to
cd
co
o
•H
S
(D
o
CD
cn
■3
•H
05 U
CD -P
co
-p -b
co pi
Pi .d
l-H CO
•rH
<H P!
O Pi
c6
->
cn
CD rd
•P Pi
cd c3
-p
CO -P
P!
H -H
os ce
PhPh
O I
Pi
•rl ••
Pi H
Ph oS
>s'Jh
/3 CD
-P
«. oS
pi m
o
•H !=
-p oi
O Ph
d
-b o3
o
Pi
Ph
•h
o
CD
03
i-H m
cr
H
o3
>
I m
X> -P
o3 Pi
Pi -P CD
CD 03 g
■Q Ph ^
S CO
3 <h -h
S O H
rH cn
05
I co
,a -P
o3 Pi
Pi -P CD
CD co E
G co
3 ch -h
!§ O H
CO
id
0) 6
d
(D
£
CO
03
d
>
o
EH
i
03
Pi
Pi
-p
o
CD
CO
1
<~^
CI
5
«H
• H
£',
o
H
CM
Cn
bO
CM
-66-
H
VX>
OS
VX>
CVJ
o
LOi
-te-
en
o
H
vx>
Is-
cn
to
LT\
-ee-
CD
■P
ct3
-p
CO
H H O f°>vX> ^ "-O
yjCUHJ LOVX) to
oj cn h to cn to ^r
o to *x> .d- vx lo
J- ^-J- CM CM
H
03
-P
o
EH
VX
cn
HOUD H HK) CM
o ^t cn lo cn to cn
H H l-O
H Is— t^i^J- CO VX>
l^-d" VX> H .d" VX
.=1- .d" m r— .d" K~>
O Lin ir\d- d" cm
LP. CM LTiLnnn
r—
m
cn
CO
-p
-p
CD i>3
CO CD
O CD
Pi "
Is—
to K"\ LT\ to O to
O-d cn I — O cn r-i
H H H -d"
OM^ n O vD VD
CT\CTiO\cM to VX!
LPwX> CM .d" VD cn
o r^ cm cn m to
cn.d to to vx> d"
r-n o -d- to ud vxi vx
vo h3 KH.O o o
O H H H. H
o3
•H
Pi
o3
•H CO
H CO
o
n3 1-3 >h
CD CD Xt
CO
Pi
Pi
CD
cn
H
r.
O
co
CD
03
-)^>
CO
Pi
CD
O
3SSO PL,
•ai
CO
CD
,Ej
CO
• H
Pi
Pi
>
-d
-p
Pi
•rH
o3
Ph
CD
Pi
d
-P
o
o3
03
4H
o
d
cn
Pi
CD
O
o
Pi
d
O
CO
S5UU
~25~
CO
-d
CM
cd o
CVI
CO Pi
r~\
to
LT>
pi cd
CTi
CT\
cn
i-i en
m
tn
*«
=
co
cd pi
U3
UD
en
•
cd
> o
H
r^>
rH
rH
CO
CD
CD
EH
•€r>
-P
tH
V •
cd
cd
r^
-p
o
|sO
•
CO
•H
a-
1 co
c^
H
rQ -P
u
co
cd Pi
CO
A
fn -P CD
^1
o
CD CO g
T^S
cdj r—
CU
-p
o
CO
E? CO
w $>>
P<H 'H
H
!=> fH
S O rH
rH
-p
<<!
,Cj CO
o ^
^ — ^
■H '5
CO
- — _--^_
pi
£ s
<d
C\J
cd| cd|
ai
•H
P= H-:
CO Pi
p! cd
TZi
en p|
r-1 CO
•V
•«
CO
0 Pi
cd pi
CO
CVi
rd
•rl C3
H
!> o
1-^1
r^i
n
P
U 1>H
K~
(H
rH
rH
•
rH
-P
CT
EH
-ee-
CO
O
to O
i — (
^_^
-P
r|
3 -1
nrl -p
O
•H
•
pi
Pi <D
ti> -P
rd
Pi
n .3
O
CO
X > <+H Pi
cd Pi
Pi -P CD
CM
"~cdf5l
C\!
P-l
CO
r=l
M H O >s
cd w a
r^ H ,q
K^
r^i
g P
CO
'O
CD
3
S cfl
0)
!>
H i-h co ^
p^H-ri
•H
cd
fx, pq <o a
fL, <a; -p cd
<tj EH Cd
la O rH
rH
r-l
■a!
CO
■p n
CO
^^_
-p
co o
-d
VJD
bO Cj|
to
^d
cd
iS
CD PI
-=|-
cq ■
LTA
Pi
•p
in a
pi cd
LPv
1 '
r^\
cd
CO
a «
i— 1 CO
M
ft
o.
cd pi
CTi
ir\
j"
Pi
CO
■H 1
t> o
Hr
CM
Oo
o
■H
O
cr
,p|
H
rH
t-^
H
fl • •
CM
EH
-te-
<4
+=
•H M
CT
v •
&
iH Cd
H
u
P4 -H
.
o
. fH
i>5 CD
^
r
in
(H
■a -P
d Pi
^.^
0
Cj
cd
U -P CD
CPi J" to I
LT\
?H
-P
#* 1~*
co co a
ro rq _£|
CM
C.j
pj
cd
r*
-P
rd
b £
E to
o
-P Ph
3 <H -H
ki O r-i
cd
4H
CO
O
pi
CO
pi cd
a
u
•b
J
pi
o
f=^H
CO
u
o
Ph
W
CH
o
rH
o
<H
CD
CO
O
CO
r-1
■H
-d
CD
•p
CO
d
CD
CO
Pi
■d
rH
•P
CO
•H
Cd
Cd
P(
o
o
i=»
■P
CO
CO
CD cd
CO vH
CD
+1
Cd
H
CO PI
o
CD
o
cd
CD -H
o
EH
-p
PI EU)
rH
r-i
o
PI Sh
H
Pi
EH
CD -H
EH >
«r^i
o
ro
~a3"
S5UU
-26-
Ph
>.
l-H
CO
w
o
CD
o
CD
CO
£>
o
u
CO -P
CD to
-P £
CO HH
p!
'J to
rl w
H Co
^H t5
o
!
TO ««
CD r-l
-P
c\5
-p
CO (1)
H nJ
^ k.
■H ^
•H
rH Cu
Ph
o
■H
-P
O
Fj
O
U
Ph
Cm
O
CD
p
H
cfi
>
C
rH
CD
rH
Co
>
Jh -P
CD CO
S
£
O rH
CD
p"
rH
co
cd
CO
pi
o
EH
; to
rQ -P
10 £
M -P O
CD CO q
S cq
3 Ch -H
£h O rH
OJ
CT
CO
'd
CD
S
rH
cti
rH
CO
1
p
o
EH
•
CO
r^
-p
Co
ri
M
•P
0
CD
03
•-{
rd
pq
,g
a
to
f^
<H
■H
o
r-\
CD
■P
CS
•P
CO
tO r-! H H CM ITi «)
J" LOi oj to J- C\J OJ
e» •» r* H jv •> g»
rH J" W O 1^ H tO
O^ rH OJ rAJ1 KA Jt
-ee-
r~\
i — i
CM
cn oj lca k^ r*->,
rH Ol IXVHr U)
LO f^\V£).H- lOH; r.^
Mj tO tO tO rO HJ- K>
OJ ■ J- o o nj- to
9» •» rf* * *> «k •»
*~D 0"i I"- OJ O OJ i*^
rH r-\ C J r^i LC> I -r^ LO
OJ
-eo-
CT\ f-^^l-,-J- ri H U)
OJ H CJ OJ VD .H- V.D
OJ
l^ 60 O <T\ O LO C^
U'J <-^ C , CD LO, to CA
OJ CJX=j- |.'iO K> O
r-o oj ,-f cjo rH tD r—
O oj r^i r-'> to ^r I—
C-/T-
r^t i^iVjd uoo to H
UD rH CJ OJ l-^H- to
OJ
CO
Q)
•P
Co
-p
c
EH
S5UU
03 -H
•H S
Pi -H
c6 tiO
> U
H -H
CO
a -p
S co
h h o ft fe;
a
n
•H
CO
u
O
rC!
4-
o
C.
ta
Co
H
Cis
CO
c
p
+^
o
Co
i
Co
4-,
O
CO
p1
05
0)
o
CD
o
M
r-J
O
CO
-27-
X
fH
t3
CO
o
■H
e
cd
o
CD
CO
{=>
Xi
o
•H
02
CD
•H
P
■P
02
P
P
-P
co
n no
P
<H I— I
O
Pt
•» CD
CO o
CD CO
-P
Oi I
■p
CO •-
H
rH 05
Cl5 -H
Ph Sh
•H CD
O -p
P o5
•H S
In
Ph S3
oi
Pi
o
•H
-P
O
o
P
Ph
O
CD
pi
H
Cfi
>
g5UU#
' 3
H
G"\
H
rQ -p
en
CM
CTV
H
Pi
-P CD
05 S
Ph £
CO
<H -h
O rH
CO
t)
bO
r°» O c\j o to r^ r^i
CXV
CD
P!
CM
j-oou;comN
vr>
d
oj
H
CM KA rH hOhH
o
H
CO
•»
•* #» t» •» «» tl
*
cd
p
O
^ 0"> 60 C\] K) iT\
r*->
I
o
,p
EH
•
02
o
CM
H=e-
rH H rH CM CM
cn
rQ
-P
05
P!
u
•P
CD
LTi
CM K> LPi I-- LPv LTM —
H
CD
CO
P
ro
riC\J nr-l CM
cr>
r°
F-H
cj
ai
H.
CO
B
<H
•H
<Zt
o
H
CO
'd
CTv
O Lnt^^HJ-K)
r-o
ID
Pi
H
rH LPi bo vr> r— CM o
O
p
Oj
1 —
cn into o ai lo, n
ai.
H
CO
f>
#v •» r» •» ■* t%
A
o5
p
r-~
W CTiK) O n Jt
-P"
t>
o
LT\
HHW^ri CM
CVJ
x\
CM
H
EH
-ce-
oS
i>
I CO
aj P
Pi -p (D
CD co s
rQ H Jp
0 co
P tH -H
!^ o H
03
to
Hr
CM
H
O
CVJ
to
CVJ
to i» O^ N I — VJ3 r-- VO
CVJ CVJ r^i H CVJ CTV
CVJ K^" H H .P"
.p- Hr o J- r— k>
to CvJ J CM U'lO
t» n « a ;\ «s
OIW O LTV J- ,H
rH CVJ t<\J$ r!
Oil
vn
to
o
rH
r<^ cm .rj- cm o l — cdT j^r.
K> K^.p- CM n H
rH
CO
CD
-P
oj
-P
CO
H
a!
-p
o
EH
o5 <d
•H P
oi p! as
•h cd h
P co ,y |> co
H -ri !h H H CO
o o o !>j p
co CD «j
O P -P -H
_ -H P O 'P
05 H CD ^p CD ,p p
O H ^ OP4 ffi H
^ P !>H
•H -H
H ri &
M
CD
-P
O
H
CO
o
CO
CD
O
c3
Vi
p
P
oi
MH
O
p
02
P
CD
O
CD
O
M
P
o
CO
02
CD
-P
05
-p
P
CD
Xi
rH
P
•H
TH
V
P
rH
O
P
P
CD
CD
r^
CD
c?
.p
CD
03
-p
CO
,P
■P
U
o
<H
Oi
H^>
03
02
CD
P
P
02
O
rH
O
CO
•H
■d
-d
•H
O
o
EH